🔗 Share this article

The nation's decisive move to ban social platforms access for those under 16 is sending ripples around the globe. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and parents are observing closely to see if this tactic will set a precedent for other nations.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a growing group of countries are exploring similar bans.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that smartphones and apps are "taking away our kids' innocence". The policy could be formalized next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an similar ban remains "a potential options on the table".
• In Spain, the president has asked the legislature to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has recommended a comparable step, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media before 15.

At the EU level, the European parliament has approved a advisory statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 except if guardian approval is provided. Even though it cautions of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"A strong age limit is a good first step," commented one European lawmaker behind the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Approach

Across Britain, the government has not ruled out a future ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in robust data".

Previously, momentum grew behind a legislative effort to enact controls on social media use by minors, but it was in the end weakened. Nonetheless, the government vowed to investigate the matter.

Advocacy groups have raised apprehensions. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after viewing disturbing social media material suggests that a simple age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of risk when young people turn 16.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are secure and fit for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, legislation is primarily occurring at the local level against a backdrop of federal gridlock.

• Utah requires guardian permission for minors to use social media and controls overnight use.
• Florida has signed a bill banning under-14s from accessing social media, though it is subject to legal challenges.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra use needing a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have likewise introduced measures demanding adult authorization for teenagers to set up social media presences.

Even with widespread concern and suggestions from some individuals to mimic this example, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, additional states are similarly exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to ban social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for Instagram to 16.

However, international agencies strike a more cautious position. A major UN agency has cautioned that social media bans carry risks and "could backfire". The agency notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for vulnerable youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize child safeguards.

While this international conversation evolves, the policies of the Australian government and several other countries show that states internationally are less and less willing to stand by for tech companies to act voluntarily.